Block shear is a limit state that should be accounted for
during the design of steel tension members. This failure mechanism combines a
tensile failure on one plane and a shear failure on a perpendicular plane. It
is important for a design equation not only to predict the capacity reliably,
but also to predict accurately the failure mode. In this study, we begin with
an overview of tension members, their behaviour and design strength which is
affected by yielding, fracture or block shear. Different codal provisions in IS
800: 2007 for tension members have been dealt, with a special focus on block
shear and its failure mechanism. Latest specifications on block shear in AISC
2005 and Eurocode 3 have also been explained so as to provide a broader view of
the standards being adopted worldwide to check failure of structures by block
shear.
Recent developments in block shear research have also been
discussed, both finite element analysis and experimental programs. Block shear
failure is not just limited to bolted connections and keeping this in mind,
research works conducted on block shear in bolted as well as welded steel
sections have been presented herein. Finally, a numerical on block shear has
been solved using the provisions in IS 800, AISC 2005 and Eurocode 3. The
results obtained shows the given section to be safe from block shear failure;
with the Eurocode provisions predicting the lowest design strength (though more
than the applied reaction), AISC value being the highest and IS 800 values
somewhere in the middle range. Based on these findings and studies, a
conclusion has been arrived at and presented at the end of the report.
Tension Members:
Tension members are linear members in which axial forces act
so as to elongate (stretch) the member. A rope, for example, is a tension
member. Tension members carry loads most efficiently, since the entire cross
section is subjected to uniform stress. Unlike compression members, they do not
fail by buckling. Ties of trusses [Fig 1.1 (a)], suspenders of cable-stayed and
suspension bridges [Fig.1.1 (b)], suspenders of buildings systems hanging from
a central core [Fig.1.1 (c)] (used in earthquake prone zones as a way of
minimising inertia forces on the structure), and sag rods of roof purlins [Fig
1.1 (d)] are other examples of tension members.
Tension members can have a variety of cross sections. Any
cross-sectional configuration may be used, because for any given material, the
only determinant of the strength of a tension member is the cross-sectional
area. Circular rods and rolled angle shapes are frequently used. Built-up
shapes either from plates, rolled shapes, or a combination of plates and rolled
shapes are sometimes used when large loads must be resisted. The single angle
and double angle sections [Fig 1.2(a)] are used in light roof trusses as in
industrial buildings. The tension members in bridge trusses are made of
channels or I sections, acting individually or built-up [Figs. 1.2(b) and
1.2(c)]. The circular rods [Fig. 1.2 (d)] are used in bracings designed to
resist loads in tension only. They buckle at very low compression and are not
considered effective. Steel wire ropes [Fig.1.2 (e)] are used as suspenders in
the cable suspended bridges and as main stays in the cable-stayed bridges.
Design Strength of Tension Members:
The strength of tension members based on IS 800:2007 is the
minimum of the following three categories as stated below:
Yielding of the gross
section, i.e. yielding of the tension member over the member length away from
the connection.
Fracture of the
effective net section, i.e. fracture of the tension member in the connection
region.
Block shear rupture,
i.e. tearing out of the connection due to the combination of tensile and shear
failure.
Block Shear Failure Mechanism:
The design strength of tension members are not always
controlled by factor of safety or by the strength of the bolts or welds with
which they are connected. They may instead be controlled by block shear
strength. In block shear mode, the failure of the member occurs along a path
involving tension on one plane and shear on a perpendicular plane along the
fasteners. When a tensile load applied to a particular connection is increased,
the fracture strength of the weaker plane approaches. This plane does not fail
instantly, because it is restrained by the stronger plane. The load can be
increased until the fracture strength of the stronger plane is reached and
during this time, the weaker plane yields. The total strength of the connection
equals the fracture strength of the stronger plane plus the yield strength of
the weaker plane. Thus, it is not realistic to add the fracture strength of the
other plane to determine the block shear resistance of a particular member.
Comments
Post a Comment